this dir | view | cards | source | edit | dark
top
Lecture
- robot = mechatronic system with perception, decision and action capabilities, that can perform in an autonomous way different tasks in the real world
- sensor = device that measures a physical property and returns a signal of varying complexity
- exteroception – information from the outside world
- interoception – information from within the body of a robot
- proprioception – information from within related to the movement of the body parts
- actuator = device generating a movement, that controls one degree of freedom (rotation, translation)
- LED is not an actuator :(
- effector … more complex for manipulation or mobility
- the three Ds: dull, dirty, dangerous (tasks)
- odometric drift – actuators and sensors are not precise, the error accumulates
- how to solve it
- use a map (purposes of a map: localization, computing the route to a given goal)
- motion planning
- feasible plan = takes the capabilities of the robot into account
- motion strategies can have different forms – it can be a path, a set of procedural instructions
- for a walking humanoid robot, the plan would be quite complex
- motion planning vs. navigation (obstacle avoidance etc.)
- motion planning – global map, strategic level
- obstacle avoidance – local map, tactical level
- workspace
- physical space where the robot lives, usually R2 or R3
- obstacles, free space
- types of models
- continuous metric model
- polygons – their vertices
- memory complexity proportional to the number of obstacles
- discrete metric model
- pixels: free, fully occupied, partially occupied
- memory complexity proportional to the size of workspace and the resolution
- topological model
- nodes and edges
- we don't care about the geometry – we only capture places and ways to move from one to another
- the robot needs to be able to localize itself (what is the current “place”) and to get from one place to another according to the edges in the graph
- hybrid
- selection criteria: sensors available, precision required, complexity (memory requirements)
- Piano Mover's Problem
- free flying robot (rigid object) = piano
- stationary obstacles (fixed rigid objects)
- the focus is on the geometry, path planning
- with moving obstacles, time becomes very important
- we need to know (model) the future motions of the obstacles in order to plan the path
- what is the robot is no longer free flying?
- two classes of kinematic constraints
- holonomic – restrict the set of possible position (like obstacles)
- example: limitations of the robotic arm due to its joints etc.
- to account for the constraints, we only add some virtual obstacles
- nonholonomic – restrict the set of possible differential motions
- example: a wheel rolling without slipping on the plane (you should move in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the wheel)
- prehensile manipulation – we grasp an object and manipulate with it
- non-prehensile manipulation – we push or throw an object
- flexible objects → mechanics of deformation
- uncertainty
- sources: sensors, actuators
- model error, action error
- human-robot motion
- main issues
- safety – we don't want the robot to collide with people
- acceptability (politeness) – the robot should not interrupt people engaging in a conversation
- attention-based HRM
- we don't want to distract people in the museum
- configuration space
- how to address motion planning
- mobile robot
- reactive strategy
- graph search, A*
- reinforcement learning
- robot position … coordinates
- arm robot
- pose … vector of joint angles